Revenue systems,not marketing activity.
Strategy, execution, and attribution wired into one chain so every rupee of spend ties back to pipeline a CFO would trust.
Growth stalls in the space between strategy and systems.
Most growth-stage companies arrive with one of three gaps. The engagement is built to close whichever applies never sold as disconnected services.
Disconnected vendors
Three agencies, no unified strategy, no one owning the number. Closed by Fractional CMO leadership that ties it together.
Strategy without execution
A beautiful deck, stuck. Closed by hands-on performance marketing across Meta, Google, and LinkedIn same operator who set the plan.
Execution without systems
Campaigns run, but nothing ties spend to revenue. Closed by RevOps and CRM automation one attribution chain end to end.
One engagement. Three layers that compound.
The senior layer you're missing.
GTM planning, revenue roadmaps, positioning, and team direction. The C-suite marketing perspective most growth-stage companies don't have above a single hire.
State the number, or don't make the claim.
Three agencies, three dashboards, and a 38% gap between what Meta reported and what landed in the CRM. No one could say which spend drove revenue.
Restructured the Meta campaign architecture, introduced server-side CAPI for signal fidelity, and wired one attribution chain: GTM → GA4 → Meta CAPI → CRM → Looker.
Signal loss fell from 38% to 6%, CPL dropped 42% in 60 days, and the channel-credit argument disappeared spend decisions now trace to pipeline.
One attribution chain ended the channel-credit fight
Unified GTM → GA4 → CRM → Looker, then reallocated ₹18L/mo of spend to ROAS-positive cohorts.
A RevOps layer that compounds pipeline
Built the RevOps layer and a Fractional CMO operating cadence; influenced pipeline grew ₹3.2Cr across two quarters.
Paid acquisition rebuilt around contribution margin
Restructured Google and Meta around margin instead of volume; CAC payback fell to under three months.
Embed. Architect. Execute. Hand over.
Embed
A two-week diagnostic. Map the funnel end to end and find the one constraint holding back revenue.
Architect
GTM plan, channel and attribution design, and a RevOps blueprint the operating system on paper before a rupee is spent.
Execute
Performance campaigns live across Meta, Google, and LinkedIn run by the same operator, no handoff loss.
Hand over
CRM workflows, dashboards, SOPs, and automation a revenue system documented to run without me.
Rahul D Sarker a growth operator, not a marketer.
I build complete revenue operating systems not disconnected marketing services. The work spans strategy, performance, and the systems that connect them, so growth-stage companies get one accountable source instead of three.
I speak in CAC, LTV, pipeline, and margin not likes, reach, or impressions. The goal is infrastructure that compounds: a system that's still working long after the engagement ends.
Practitioner breakdowns, not motivation.
Why server-side CAPI cut our signal loss from 38% to 6%
Browser tracking is leaking more than you think. Here's the exact GTM-to-CAPI setup and what it recovered.
The attribution chain that ended the channel-credit argument
One source of truth from ad click to closed deal and why your dashboards keep disagreeing until you have it.
Connecting Meta Ads to Claude with actual tool calls
Not a wrapper prompt real tool calls via meta-ads-mcp. What it automates, and where it still needs an operator.
Before the call.
A Fractional CMO at RDS & CO owns the revenue number across the full stack — not a single channel. The scope covers GTM strategy, paid media execution, and the RevOps systems that tie them together: the senior layer most growth-stage teams are missing.
A marketing agency executes one channel and delivers a monthly report. This engagement connects strategy, paid execution, and attribution into a single chain — built and run by one operator — and hands over a documented system that keeps working after the engagement ends.
This engagement is built for growth-stage companies generating ₹5Cr–₹100Cr ARR, spending ₹2L or more per month on marketing, with a team of 5–100 people and enough traction to justify building the revenue system around it.
Both strategy and execution are included — that is the core model. The same operator who builds the GTM plan runs the Meta and Google campaigns, sets up the CRM, and closes the attribution loop. No handoff means no signal lost between the deck and the dashboard.
Every engagement begins with a two-week paid diagnostic to surface the binding constraint, followed by a defined phase covering strategy, execution, and system handover. Deliverables, timeline, and success criteria are documented and agreed before any work begins.