RevOps
What a new sales hire costs before they hit full productivity.
- Category
- RevOps
- Signup
- None
- Your data
- Stays in your browser
- Also in
- Claude, via MCP
Over a 6-month ramp each rep delivers about 3.5 months of full output, so 3 hires cost $90,000 in unproductive time. Bookings are not margin, so treat the payback month as a floor.
About this calculator
A new rep costs full salary from day one but sells at full pace only months later. Hiring plans that assume instant productivity miss the number. This calculator shows how much bookings you give up during ramp, how much of the payroll goes to unproductive time, and when each hire pays back.
How to use it
- Enter the number of reps you are hiring and the ramp period in months. Defaults are editable examples.
- Pick a ramp curve: linear, slow start or fast start.
- Enter the monthly quota of a fully ramped rep and the fully loaded monthly cost per rep.
- Read cost of ramp, revenue lag, total cost during ramp, first-year bookings and the payback month per rep.
Methodology
Productivity in month m of a ramp of R months is m ÷ R for the linear curve, (m ÷ R)² for slow start and the square root of (m ÷ R) for fast start. From month R onward productivity is 100%.
Productive months during ramp = the sum of monthly productivity over months 1 to R. Idle months = R − productive months.
Revenue lag = idle months × fully ramped monthly quota × hires. Cost of ramp = idle months × monthly cost × hires. Total cost during ramp = R × monthly cost × hires.
First-year bookings = the sum of monthly productivity over months 1 to 12 × monthly quota × hires. Payback month is the first month, up to 36, where one rep's cumulative bookings meet cumulative cost. Bookings are compared with cost directly, not gross margin, so real payback is later.
Go deeper
FAQ
Linear fits most teams without data. Slow start suits long or complex sales cycles where the first deals take months to close. Fast start suits transactional sales with inbound leads available from week one. Your own historical cohort data is the best guide.
Base salary, expected variable pay, benefits and taxes, software seats, equipment and a share of manager time. Leaving these out makes ramp look cheaper than it is.
No. Early attrition makes ramp more expensive because the cost is spent without the productive months. Treat the result as a best case if attrition is a concern.
Numbers looking off?
If the model says one thing and the pipeline says another, that gap is usually where the revenue is. A 30-minute call finds it.
It starts with a 30-minute call. Pick a time below.
Choose a time